Skip to content

CONSTRUCTION SCAM? Boca Raton Mandarin Oriental Condo Delays Lead To Lawsuit

Mandarin Oriental Residences Boca Raton

Condo Buyer Wants Money Back After Multi-Year Delay. Developer Says “No.”

%%
From the Mandarin Oriental Residences Boca Raton sales website, showing the building status as of late 2023.

BY: LITIGATION DESK | BocaNewsNow.com

BOCA RATON, FL (BocaNewsNow.com) (Copyright © 2024 MetroDesk Media, LLC) — The company behind the very much delayed “The Residences — Mandarin Oriental Boca Raton” is refusing to refund the $1.3M deposit paid by the buyer of a condominium, even though the building remains under construction years after it was supposed to be complete.

Frank and Nancy Scala say they paid the deposit to “Via Mizner Owner III, LLC” for the condo that was supposed to be ready for closing three years ago. But the building is just a “shell,” according to a lawsuit they’ve filed and images posted by Via Mizner on the Mandarin Oriental Residences website. Despite apparent contractual guarantees that deposits would be refunded if the project ran more than three years late, Via Mizner allegedly refuses to issue a refund. BocaNewsNow.com obtained the complaint which you can read in its entirety, below. Here’s a key section:

%%
The Mandarin Oriental Boca Raton residential website. This is what the residences may look like.

“This is an action for contractual damages as it relates to the purchase of a condominium unit by the Plaintiffs from the Defendant. Defendant is the developer of the Tower 105 Condominium, also known as The Residences-Mandarin Oriental-Boca Raton. On April 21, 2021, Plaintiffs and Defendant executed a Purchase Agreement for the purchase of a condominium unit (Unit 812) being developed and sold by the Defendant in Boca Raton, Florida.

In a Second Addendum to that Purchase Agreement, dated June 24, 2021, Plaintiffs also purchased a private garage unit on the condominium property. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement which was drafted by the Defendant, the estimated completion and delivery date of Unit 812 was to take place in June 2021. In conjunction with the Purchase Agreement and the Second Addendum, Plaintiffs gave Defendant deposits totaling $1,279,000.00. Section 11 of the Purchase Agreement contains a time limit for when a closing on the condominium unit to be purchased by Plaintiffs is to have taken place. That Section states:“

“Closing Date. Buyer understands that Seller has the right to schedule the date, time and place for closing, provided, however, that the Unit shall be completed and delivered to Buyer within three (3) years after the Estimated Completion Date. Pursuant to Section 11 of the Purchase Agreement, a closing on the condominium unit purchased by Plaintiffs and developed by Defendant was to have taken place no later than June 30, 2024. No closing for the unit took place on or before June 30, 2024. In fact, as of the date of this complaint, the entire structure of the Tower 105 Condominium is still just a few steps beyond a concrete shell and a closing is far off into the future. The Purchase Agreement between the parties contains a Section in which the Defaults of the Parties are addressed (and states):”

“Buyer will give Seller 20 days written notice of any default by Seller under this Agreement and if Seller does not thereafter cure the default within such 20 day period (unless such default cannot be cured within such 20 day period in which case Seller shall have such additional time as may be necessary to cure the default so long as Seller is diligently attempting to cure the same). Buyer may demand the return of its deposits, together with any and all interest actually earned thereon, and Buyer may pursue a claim against Seller for actual damages (but not consequential, special or punitive damages) on account of any breach by Seller.”

“As a result of Defendant failing to deliver and hold a closing for the purchased condominium unit or before June 30, 2024, Defendant is in default under the Purchase Agreement. As a result of the Seller’s default, on July 5, 2024, Plaintiffs, through their attorney demanded a return of their deposit, as well as interest on those deposit funds. On August 10, 2024, after over a month with no communication whatsoever from Defendant, the Scalas were told, without any explanation or legal basis, that they were “not entitled” to a return of their deposit.”

Via Mizner had not filed a response to the suit as of the afternoon of Saturday, August 17th, 2024. The Scala family is represented by Attorney James Ferrara of Hinshaw and Culbertson in Fort Lauderdale. Read the complete lawsuit here.

Have an announcement that's not quite news? BocaNewsNow.com can help spread the word. CLICK HERE, LEARN MORE. We have millions of page interactions each month. This is a great place for your press releases or advertisement.

Sign Up Here for our free nightly newsletter and breaking news email alerts. Click Here. We won't spam you. Unsubscribe anytime.

ATTENTION PERSONAL INJURY ATTORNEYS: More than 200 of the nation's leading personal injury attorneys rely on this expert to dramatically increase value in injury, wrongful death, medical malpractice, truck accident, and other major cases. LEARN MORE NOW.